Search results

The assertions of the government that poverty eradication and social development generally are the main challenges and that it is fully committed to address these issues have continued over time. But how genuine this claim is a matter of great concern. So, this chapter may be an attempt to analyze patterns in social sector expenditure on education (SSEE) and its impact on Human Development Index (HDI) among different states in India. The combined social sector expenditures (SSE) of Centre and States, which provide the best picture of India’s commitment towards the social sector in education, may be assessed. There are diverse ways of inspecting the trends in expenditures. Firstly, to look at SSE as a proportion of gross state domestic product (GSDP), secondly is to calculate SSE as percentage of aggregate budget expenditure, thirdly is to look at the real per capita expenditure (PCE) (at constant prices) for the social sector in the case of the states. This chapter looks at the trends in SSEE, considering all the alternative ways and the impact of SSEE on HDI. The result of the study shows that there is a positive relationship between SSEE and HDI. SSEE may lead to increases in gross enrolment ratio (GER) and literacy rate (LR). An increase in GER and LR may help in increasing the HDI.

The purpose of this paper is to empirically examine the inequality perpetuated through social categories in accessing the social capital generated through the microfinance interventions in India as the country has pronounced economic inequality by social categories like many developing stratified societies.

The study uses survey data collected from 75 villages in rural India and tests whether the formation and maximization of social capital through self-help groups (SHGs) is dominated by social categories, e.g. high-caste groups, males and superior occupation classes. Using logistic regression framework, the study assesses the formation and maximization of social capital through multiple SHG membership.

The paper finds that the microfinance approach of empowering weaker sections is considerably limited in its success, in the sense that it provides them with the opportunity to the credit access and support through SHGs. But, the empirical model further indicates that social capital in form of these SHGs may fall prey to the dominant social categories, and thus, these institutions may potentially enhance inequality.

The paper is derived from the secondary data set, so it is unable to comment field reality qualitatively.

Microfinance policy makers will have an improved understanding of inherent social inequalities while implementing group-based programs in socially stratified societies.

Social capital, if treated as an outcome accumulated in form of groups, provides with an important framework to assess the unequal access through the microfinance interventions. Overlooking the inherent unequal access will deceive the purpose of social justice in the group-based interventions. The microfinance and other welfare policies engaged in group formation and generating the social capital need to be more sensitive to the disadvantageous sections while focusing on multiple group access by disadvantaged social groups.